Fehler & Idempotenz

Two aspects of an API contract are routinely neglected and cause the worst production incidents: how errors are communicated and what happens when a request is retried. A consistent, machine-readable error format lets clients handle failure sanely instead of scraping prose; idempotency lets a client safely retry after a timeout without double-charging a customer. Both are part of the contract, and getting them right is what separates a robust API from a fragile one.

A consistent, machine-readable error contract

The worst error handling returns different shapes from different endpoints - {"error": "..."} here, {"message": "...", "code": 5} there, a raw stack trace somewhere else. Clients can't handle any of it uniformly. The standard fix is RFC 9457 Problem Details (formerly RFC 7807): one JSON shape for every error across your API:

HTTP/1.1 409 Conflict
Content-Type: application/problem+json
{
  "type":     "https://api.ledger.dev/problems/insufficient-funds",
  "title":    "Insufficient funds",
  "status":   409,
  "detail":   "Account 42 has a balance of 30.00 USD; the transfer requires 50.00 USD.",
  "instance": "/accounts/42/transfers/abc",
  "balance":  "30.00"
}

• type - a stable URI identifying the kind of error, which clients can branch on programmatically.
• title - a short human-readable summary; detail - specifics for this occurrence.
• status - mirrors the HTTP status.
• Extension members (balance) - domain-specific data the client can use.

Spring Boot supports this natively (ProblemDetail and @ExceptionHandler). The win: one error shape everywhere, machine-readable type codes, and no leaking of stack traces. Consumers write error handling once.

Idempotency: making retries safe

Networks fail after a request is processed but before the response arrives. The client times out, doesn't know if it worked, and retries. For a GET or PUT that's fine (idempotent by nature). But for a POST /transfers or POST /payments, a naive retry charges the customer twice. This is one of the most common and damaging real-world API bugs.

The solution is an idempotency key: the client generates a unique key per logical operation and sends it with the request; the server remembers keys it has processed and returns the original result for a repeat:

POST /payments
Idempotency-Key: 7f3a-...-c1     ← client-generated, unique per logical payment

Server logic:
  seen this key before?
    no  → process the payment, store (key → result), return 201
    yes → do NOT process again; return the stored original result (201)

Now a retried request with the same key is a no-op that returns the first response - the customer is charged exactly once, no matter how many times the client retries. This is exactly how Stripe and other payment APIs work, and it's the correct pattern for any non-idempotent, side-effecting operation. (Note the connection to the batch/messaging modules: idempotency is the same defense against duplicate delivery, here at the API edge.)

Status codes carry retry semantics

The error contract and idempotency meet in status codes, which tell the client whether to retry:

• 4xx - the client's fault (bad input, not found, conflict). Retrying the same request won't help; fix it first. Don't auto-retry.
• 5xx and timeouts - possibly transient server/network trouble. Safe to retry if the operation is idempotent (naturally, or via an idempotency key). This is why idempotency and error design are one topic: together they tell a client exactly when a retry is safe.